This proposal is not the final iteration but is an evolving document. Recently, for example, we were pleased to introduce one possible approach, as described in our PARAKEET proposal.

We will continue to explore these approaches with the community. The industry is on a journey and there will be browser-based proposals that do not need individual user ids and ID-based proposals that are based on consent and first party relationships. That's also why we do not support solutions that leverage non-consented user identity signals, such as fingerprinting. Like Google, we support solutions that give users clear consent, and do not bypass consumer choice. We believe in a future where the web can provide people with privacy, transparency and control while also supporting responsible business models to create a vibrant, open and diverse ecosystem. The Shields defaults give you solid protection without making it harder to browse the Web.Microsoft wasn't as firm against FLoC as other browser makers, but doesn't seem to be planning to utilize it. Configuring your protections to the highest level by blocking JavaScript and all cookies will keep your browser safer, but it may also break some sites. If you know what you’re doing, you can fine-tune this detection within the Shields panel. Blocking malicious code and malicious sites - like ones which try to use your computer to mine cryptocurrencies.Upgrading you to secure connections whenever sites support them.Making your browser harder to recognize and follow without cookies.Throwing away cookies other than the ones from the sites you actually visit.Blocking most ads and the trackers that come with them.Shields blocks this type of content, keeping you safe and even increasing your browsing speed. Many sites include all kinds of trackers which can follow you across the Web. Shields protects your privacy as you browse by making you harder to track from site to site.

Brave browser down